Argument drug testing in the workplace

Workplace testing has become popular as employers screen their workers in an effort to figure out who would be the best candidate for promotion or who is responsible for a workplace problem in certain situations, employers might ask employees to submit to medical exams, drug tests, psychological . By kent willis, executive director, aclu of virginia indiscriminate testing of employees for drug use is an intrusive and degrading process that undermines our most deeply held tenets of fairness and privacy in the workplace. The argument that workers who are on drugs put other lives at risk is a solid one the proposal of mandatory drug testing in the workplace takes matters to a new level and raises obvious . A drug test is not likely to catch most drug users alcohol and most drugs are virtually undetectable unless the student is under the influence at the time the test is administered this policy may encourage students to use more dangerous drugs to avoid detection. There is no denying that workplace drug testing offers an objective and generally accurate way to establish the truth of someone's drug use in situations where the employee has a responsibility for the safety and/or welfare of others, and the employer has a responsibility to ensure the employees' competence, there is a strong argument for .

The first argument used for work place drug testing is productivity not only should employees object to random drug testing, but employers should be aware of a recent study, the first of its kind, which demonstrates that employers who institute random drug testing programs are taking a significant business risk. The drug and alcohol testing industry association (datia) is the national voice for program managers, laboratories, collection sites, third party administrators and other businesses which are a key part in drug deterrence and detection. With more states coming closer to legalizing marijuana, drug testing in the workplace has become an increasingly hot topic workplace drug testing began in 1986 when president ronald reagan mandated drug tests for all federal employees the practice quickly became commonplace and by 1996, 86 percent .

drug testing in the workplace drug testing in the workplace can seem impersonal and invasive towards employees but it is a process that is done when an employer has reasonable suspicion that employees are using drugs at work coming from a variety of sources such as tips, accidents or behavioral problems, actual observation of drug use, and . The subject of drug testing in the workplace is a controversial one for businesses many arguments exist supporting both sides of the debate some business owners feel they have every right to . The arguments against drug testing are it is excessively invasive, may damage relations between employers and employees, and could hamper the recruitment and retention of good staff in 1986 the regan administration recommended a drug-testing program for employers.

Drug testing in the workplace argumentative essay by crown drug testing in the workplace this paper discusses whether the costs for drug testing in the workplace are greater than the benefits. Why do employers still routinely drug-test workers that’s not to say that workplace drug testing will help to usher in a colorblind society, and one peculiar side effect may not justify a . List of cons of drug testing in the workplace 1 violation of personal space those who are against drug testing believe that it is a violation of an employee’s personal space and their rights to their own free time. This paper intends to make assertions against drug testing in the workplace especially where the activities of others could be disturbed - argument: drug testing in the workplace (against) introduction. An effective drug testing program promotes a safe, productive workplace in addition to a multitude of other benefits, according to a recent industry poll this article explores the many advantages .

Argument drug testing in the workplace

Workplace drug testing is an inherently controversial subject, one that questions where the line should be drawn between the right to privacy and the right to professionalism. The defense/denial of the claim would be based upon the argument that the positive drug test is an indication of an illegal activity, is a violation of employer policy, is an indication that the employee was “outside the scope” when the injury occurred – or all of the above. List of cons of drug testing in the workplace 1 adversely impacts employee morale the argument then is that what the employee does on his or her personal time . By those arguments which support both sides of the debate, we can discern that indeed, there are advantages and disadvantages of workplace drug testing here are some of the pros and cons of drug testing in the workplace.

  • The need for workplace drug testing has elevated on so many levels, since the problem on drug abuse started taking center stage these days, drug testing has become more and more acceptable, as the rise in notoriety of drug abuse continues to haunt individuals, families, industries, and entire communities.
  • 2 ethical issues in workplace drug testing in europe by behrouz shahandeh and joannah caborn introduction workplace drug testing remains a sensitive issue because of .

Drug testing in the workplace essay examples 2 total results an argument against drug testing in the workplace 1,453 words 3 pages the modern world's drug . Drug testing in the workplace is providing a safer workplace for employees, drug use results in more accidents on the job this also protects the company from lawsuits and claims this also protects the company from lawsuits and claims. Having a comprehensive drug policy in the workplace can potentially keep employees safe from accidents caused by impaired coworkers drug testing may make employees feel better, knowing that their fellow coworkers are not under the influence testing also has the benefit of catching someone’s drug .

argument drug testing in the workplace The argument against drug testing holds more tangible evidence than the argument for it they provided judicial rulings, factual evidence pertaining to reliability and validity of the testing procedures and true cases supporting their beliefs. argument drug testing in the workplace The argument against drug testing holds more tangible evidence than the argument for it they provided judicial rulings, factual evidence pertaining to reliability and validity of the testing procedures and true cases supporting their beliefs.
Argument drug testing in the workplace
Rated 3/5 based on 34 review

2018.